stdjet.scienceandtechnology.com.vn

VNUHCM Journal of

Engineering and Technology

An official journal of Viet Nam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam since 2018

ISSN 2615-9872

Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

 Research article

HTML

3

Total

3

Share

A general mathematical model to determine temperature and moisture distributions in drying of spherical products: case studies of green peas, barley, and cranberry






 Open Access

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Abstract

Forced convection drying is a simple and effective dehydration method widely applied in post-harvest technology. Sphere-shaped materials account for a large proportion compared to other shapes. Therefore, this study forms a general mathematical model and resolution method to predict the temperature and moisture content of spherical drying materials with time. Three representative spheres of green peas, cranberries, and barley were used as case studies to validate the simulation results with experimental results. All three crops are widely used in cooking. Green peas are often used in stews, salads or processed into soybeans. Cranberries are frequently employed in desserts, juices or processed into jam. Barley is often used to make bread and beer and is also an important grain source in human nutrition. The Arrhenius model predicts the moisture diffusion coefficient with temperature to link the temperature and moisture equations, and they are solved simultaneously. In drying applications, the Arrhenius model is often utilized to describe the temperature dependence of moisture diffusion coefficients or drying rates. By applying the Arrhenius equation to drying kinetics, the relationship between drying rate and temperature can be quantified, allowing for the prediction and optimization of drying processes under different temperature conditions. These three objects have very different input parameters to illustrate the wide applicability of the proposed solution method. The results show that there is a large difference in moisture content at the center and surface of a crop. On the contrary, the temperature is evenly distributed, and the dried object quickly reaches the drying air temperature. The laws of heat transfer and moisture transfer are analogy. However, the moisture diffusion coefficient and moisture transfer coefficient are much smaller than the thermal diffusion coefficient and heat transfer coefficient.

Introduction

Crop drying plays a crucial role in agricultural production and post-harvest management. Its primary objectives are to reduce the moisture content of harvested crops to safe levels, preserve their quality, and prevent spoilage 1 . Studying the kinetics of drying process is a necessary preliminary step to determine the drying model and parameters such as drying constant, moisture transfer coefficient, moisture diffusion coefficient, and heat transfer coefficient. From these parameters, engineer can use to predict moisture distribution and temperature inside the drying object 2 . This prediction can be done in three ways: Analytical solution, numerical simulation, or self-developed code. The analytical method is quite complicated because it involves partial differential equations (PDEs). Numerical simulation methods require high-configuration computers and simulation software, e.g., ANSYS, Comsol. The self-developed code method can use popular and compact software such as Excel, EES, Matlab to compose calculation programs for objects with simple geometries such as rectangles, cylinders and spheres 3 . Most fruits, vegetables, and seeds are spherical in shape, such as green peas, barley, cranberries, grapes, and plums 4 , 5 , 6 . In this study, the first three types of agricultural products were selected as case studies.

Green peas, scientifically known as Pisum sativum, are a versatile and nutritious vegetable widely cultivated and consumed around the world. Belonging to the legume family, green peas are characterized by their small, round shape and vibrant green color. They are commonly consumed fresh, frozen, or dried and are renowned for their sweet flavor and tender texture 7 . Cranberries are widely used in the production of juices, sauces, jams, and dried fruit snacks. Cranberry juice is particularly popular and is often consumed for its potential health benefits, including supporting urinary tract health 8 . Barley is a good source of vitamins and minerals, including vitamin B6, niacin, thiamine, riboflavin, iron, magnesium, phosphorus, and selenium. It also contains antioxidants such as phenolic acids, flavonoids, and tocopherols, which help protect against oxidative stress and inflammation 9 .

It is difficult to measure the temperature and moisture inside the drying object because of its small size. But the temperature or moisture is important since it is possible that the surface moisture is as desired but not at the center, affecting the storage time and lifespan. Therefore, this study is to develop a general numerical model that can predict the temperature and moisture distribution inside a spherical agricultural product. The governing equations, numerical method, parameters required for simulation, and validation of simulation results are presented and analyzed.

Heat-mass transfer coupling model and numerical method

Let the initial spherical moist object have radius r 0 , moisture content M 0 and temperature T 0 as shown in Figure 1 . Distribution of temperature (T) and moisture (M) of the object according to radius (r) and time (t), i.e., T(t,r) and M( t,r), respectively can be described by the heat conduction equation and Fick's diffusion equation as follows:

Figure 1 . Coordinate along sphere radius

where is thermal diffusivity (m 2 /s),

D is moisture diffusivity (m 2 /s),

M is dry basis moisture content (kg/kg db),

r is space coordinate (m),

T is temperature (°C),

t is time (s).

Boundary conditions for Eqs. (1) and (2) are as follows:

where T d is drying temperature (°C),

k is thermal conductivity of the product (W/m K),

h is the heat transfer coefficient (W/m 2 K),

h m is mass transfer coefficient (m/s),

M e is equilibrium moisture content (kg/kg db).

The system of differential equations above and the associated boundary conditions can be solved using the finite difference method. With the spatial discretization as shown in Figure 2 , the implicit method and central difference scheme are applied to Eqs. (1) and (2) into discretization equations as follows:

Discrete equations of boundary conditions are given as:

The discrete equations (7) and (8) form systems of three-diagonal linear equations and are solved using the Thomas algorithm.

Figure 2 . Spatial discretization

Results and discussion

This section illustrates the results using the finite difference method mentioned above. Spherical moist objects consisting of green peas, cranberries, and barley were used as case studies for application of the mathematical model and resolution method. The parameters of the spheres are shown in Table 1 . The number of nodes is set N = 30 in the computational method. This number was selected after a grid independence test. The self-developed code was implemented in MATLAB software. Moisture diffusion coefficient (D) according to drying temperature (T in Kelvin) is calculated from the Arrhenius equation. The equation has the following form 10 :

where D 0 is pre-exponential factor (m 2 /s),

E a is activation energy (J/mol),

R g is universal gas constant, R g = 8314 J/mol K.

Table 1 Necessary inputs to the mathematical modeling

Figure 3 . Verification of moisture content with experimental data. a) Green peas 16 , b) Cranberry 17 , c) Barley 18

Figure 3 
<a class=18" width="300" height="200">

[Download figure]

Figure 3 shows the moisture content profiles of three spherical objects compared to experimental data. The unit of x-axis was different from Figure 3 a, b, and c because the three test-cases are different materials. There is good agreement between the simulation results in this study and the experimental results, especially with drying green peas. For cranberries at about 4-hour drying time and Barley drying after 150 s, the moisture content prediction of the present study is slightly greater than the experimental data. This can be explained by the fact that the current mathematical model does not consider shrinkage of the drying material. When shrinkage is taken into account, the moisture content of the calculation will be reduced.

Figure 4 . Moisture content distribution with time. a) Green peas, b) Cranberry, c) Barley

The internal moisture content of the objects with time from the simulation is seen in Figure 4 . The scale of x-axis was different between subfigures because the three test-cases have different diameters. The diameter of cranberry is much more larger those of green peas and barley. After one hour of drying, the moisture content at the center of the green peas decreased from 3 to 2.6 kg/kg db. There is a huge moisture difference of up to 2 kg/kg db at the surface of the peas and the center at this time. Because this is the stage of surface moisture evaporation. After 5 hours of drying, the temperature inside the peas is relatively uniform. Similar developments occurred for cranberries. As for barley, due to its very small size and small initial moisture content, the drying time is quite short. In the first 50 s, there is only a change in moisture close to the barley’s surface.

Figure 5 . Temperature of spherical products with time. a) Green peas, b) Cranberry, c) Barley

Figure 5 presents the temperature variation inside the three spheres. Due to the small size of the objects, after a short drying time, the temperature of the products approaches the drying temperature. In addition, the thermal diffusivity is larger than the moisture diffusivity, so the temperature distribution is relatively more uniform than the moisture distribution at the same time. This means that the heat transfer Biot number (= 2r 0 h/k) is less than the mass transfer Biot number (= 2r 0 h m /D).

Conclusions

The partial differential equations of heat transfer and moisture transfer describing drying of sphere-shaped material are presented in this article. The finite difference method is proposed to discretize the equations and boundary conditions. Three spherical objects were reviewed for the necessary drying parameters, and the drying curve was compared between the numerical approximation and experiment. The results show great agreement with experimental data. Therefore, the current mathematical model can be applied to many different spherical drying objects to determine the temperature and moisture distribution inside the object as well as the average temperature and moisture with drying time. In addition, water evaporation and shrinkage should be expanded into consideration to improve the mathematical model and reduce deviations from experimental results.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

There is no conflict of interest.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION

Pham Ba Thao: hardware, software, validation, formal analysis, writing draft.

Duong Cong Truyen: derivation, program.

Nguyen Minh Phu: review and editing.

References

  1. Jangde PK, Singh A, Arjunan TV. Efficient solar drying techniques: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022;29(34):50970-83. . ;:. Google Scholar
  2. Mrkić V, Ukrainczyk M, Tripalo B. Applicability of moisture transfer Bi–Di correlation for convective drying of broccoli. J Food Eng. 2007;79(2):640-6. . ;:. Google Scholar
  3. Arunsandeep G, Chandramohan V. Numerical solution for determining the temperature and moisture distributions of rectangular, cylindrical, and spherical objects during drying. J Eng Phys Thermophys. 2018;91:895-906. . ;:. Google Scholar
  4. Bennamoun L, Belhamri A. Numerical simulation of drying under variable external conditions: Application to solar drying of seedless grapes. J Food Eng. 2006;76(2):179-87. . ;:. Google Scholar
  5. Di Matteo M, Cinquanta L, Galiero G, Crescitelli S. A mathematical model of mass transfer in spherical geometry: plum (Prunus domestica) drying. J Food Eng. 2003;58(2):183-92. . ;:. Google Scholar
  6. El-Sebaii A, Aboul-Enein S, Ramadan MR, El-Gohary HG. Experimental investigation of an indirect type natural convection solar dryer. Energy Convers Manag. 2002;43(16):2251-66. . ;:. Google Scholar
  7. Pardeshi I, Arora S, Borker P. Thin-layer drying of green peas and selection of a suitable thin-layer drying model. Dry Technol. 2009;27(2):288-95. . ;:. Google Scholar
  8. Zhou YH, Zhang B, Yu X, Xie F, Wu X, Lin H. Microwave-vacuum-assisted drying of pretreated cranberries: Drying kinetics, bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity. LWT. 2021;146:111464. . ;:. Google Scholar
  9. Markowski M, Białobrzewski I, Modrzewska A. Kinetics of spouted-bed drying of barley: Diffusivities for sphere and ellipsoid. J Food Eng. 2010;96(3):380-7. . ;:. Google Scholar
  10. Wang C, Huang F, Wang X, Zhang Y, Cheng Y, Song X. Analytical solution for the heat and mass transfer of spherical grains during drying. Biosyst Eng. 2021;212:399-412. . ;:. Google Scholar
  11. Bruce DM. Exposed-layer barley drying: Three models fitted to new data up to 150°C. J Agric Eng Res. 1985;32(4):337-48. . ;:. Google Scholar
  12. Goyal MK, Ture SA, Chandramohan V. Effect of shrinkage in convective drying of spherical food material: A numerical solution. Arab J Sci Eng. 2021;46(12):12283-98. . ;:. Google Scholar
  13. Arunsandeep G, Chandramohan V, Devi RR, Rajamani R, Ranganathan B. A numerical model for drying of spherical object in an indirect type solar dryer and estimating the drying time at different moisture level and air temperature. Int J Green Energy. 2018;15(3):189-200. . ;:. Google Scholar
  14. Anwar S, Tiwari G. Convective heat transfer coefficient of crops in forced convection drying–an experimental study. Energy Convers Manag. 2001;42(14):1687-98. . ;:. Google Scholar
  15. Chandramohan V. Experimental analysis and simultaneous heat and moisture transfer with coupled CFD model for convective drying of moist object. Int J Comput Methods Eng Sci Mech. 2016;17(1):59-71. . ;:. Google Scholar
  16. Dutta S, Nema V, Bhardwaj R. Drying behaviour of spherical grains. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 1988;31(4):855-61. . ;:. Google Scholar
  17. Zielinska M, Ropelewska E, Zapotoczny P. Effects of freezing and hot air drying on the physical, morphological and thermal properties of cranberries (Vaccinium macrocarpon). Food Bioprod Process. 2018;110:40-9. . ;:. Google Scholar
  18. Sokhansanj S, Bruce DM. A conduction model to predict grain temperatures in grain drying simulation. Trans ASAE. 1987;30(4):1181-4. . ;:. Google Scholar


Author's Affiliation
Article Details

Issue: Vol 7 No 4 (2024)
Page No.: 2379-2384
Published: Dec 31, 2024
Section: Research article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32508/stdjet.v7i4.1361

 Copyright Info

Creative Commons License

Copyright: The Authors. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

 How to Cite
Thao, P. B., Truyen, D. C., & Phu, N. M. (2024). A general mathematical model to determine temperature and moisture distributions in drying of spherical products: case studies of green peas, barley, and cranberry. VNUHCM Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(4), 2379-2384. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32508/stdjet.v7i4.1361

 Cited by



Article level Metrics by Paperbuzz/Impactstory
Article level Metrics by Altmetrics

 Article Statistics
HTML = 3 times
PDF   = 3 times
XML   = 0 times
Total   = 3 times