VNUHCM Journal of

Engineering and Technology

An official journal of Viet Nam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam since 2018

ISSN 2615-9872

Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

 Research article

HTML

3

Total

6

Share

Evaluating the effect of shear connection degree and shear connector shape on the bending behavior of steel-concrete composite beam






 Open Access

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Abstract

The steel-concrete composite beams are created from the steel girder, the concrete slab, the shear connectors, and transverse reinforcement.  The shear connectors play an important role in incorporating the steel girder and the concrete slab working together as a unity. The existence of the shear connectors will restrain the relative slip between the steel girder and the concrete slab. This enhances the load capacity and reduces the vertical deflection of the steel-concrete composite beams. The experimental study was carried out on three steel-concrete composite beams using perfobond shear connectors to investigate the effect of the shear connection degree and shape on the bending behavior of three steel-concrete composite beams. These steel-concrete composite beams had different number of shear connectors and shapes. The parameters evaluated here included the load capacity and the vertical deflection of composite beams. The shear capacity of perfobond shear connector was obtained from push-out tests. The load capacity of steel-concrete composite beam with full shear connection degree and partial shear degree were also determined by the prediction formula to evaluate the reliability of the experiment.

INTRODUCTION

The steel-concrete composite beams using perfobond shear connectors have been widely studied around the world. This shear connector has been considered a popular connector in the future. The load capacity of perfobond shear connectors has been obtained from push-out tests 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 and then some authors have based on their data to develop into prediction formula 2 . Some authors: P.C.G. da S. Vellasco, L. F. Costa-Neves, et al. focused on studying T-perfobond shear connectors 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 to enhance the mechanical behavior of this shear connector. Kun-Soo Kim, et al studied Y-perfobond subjected to cyclic loading to verify the effect of cyclic behavior on shear connection using stubby Y-type perfobond rib shear connectors 16 . All studies were carried out on small specimens with push-out tests. These experimental studies evaluated the effect of parameters on the mechanical behavior of perfobond shear connectors. The studied parameters included the compressive strength of the concrete, the thickness of the concrete slab, the dimensions of perfobond shear connector, the transverse reinforcement passing through the holes, and the hole diameter. The concrete used for tests was normal, lightweight, and high-strength concrete. The push-out tests for small specimens mainly investigate the load capacity of perfobond shear connectors, the relative slip between the steel girder and the concrete slab, and the failure modes of specimens. Some authors carried out a large-scale specimen to investigate the bending behavior of steel-concrete composite beams. E.G. Oguejiofor and M.U. Hosain tested six full-scale beams to evaluate the effect of the number of perfobond shear connectors, and the number of transverse reinforcements passing through the holes on the bending behavior of the steel-concrete composite beam 17 . The hole of perfobond shear connector in this study had the shape of a circle. Gaetano Manfredi theoretically studied the ductility of composite beams under negative bending 18 . The author used a refined model to the influence of the properties of reinforcing steel on the rotational capacity of composite beams under negative bending and validated with experimental tests. The shear connectors used in this study were stud connectors. Jianguo Nie established a mechanics model based on elastic theory to investigate the stiffness of composite beams in negative bending regions by considering slips at the steel beam–concrete slab interface and concrete–reinforcement interface 19 . These results were validated to three composite beams with profiled sheeting under negative bending. G. Vasdravellis investigated the behavior of Six full-scale steel–concrete composite beams using stud shear connectors subjected to the combined effects of negative bending and axial compression 20 . In this study, three large-scale steel-concrete composite beams were carried out to investigate the effect of the shear connection degree and the shape of the shear connector on the bending behavior of the steel-concrete composite beams. Perfobond shear connector was used to prevent the relative slip between the steel girder and the concrete slab. Perfobond has the shape of ℧ open holes to place the transverse reinforcement passing through the holes easily.

MATERIALS

The steel-concrete composite beams are created from the steel girder, the concrete slab, the shear connectors, and reinforcements. These components must be determined the mechanical characteristics before conducting bending tests.

Concrete

Concrete used in steel-concrete composite beams was M350. The aggregate gradation is shown in Table 1 . The concrete was cured in 28 days and tested in compliance with TCVN 3118-1993 21 . The concrete compressive strength test was carried out at the time of the bending test. The test results of concrete compressive strength are shown in Table 2 .

Table 1 The aggregate gradation for 1 m 3 concrete

Table 2 Mechanical characteristics of concrete

Plate, hot-rolled steel, reinforcement

The test result of steel is presented in Table 3 .

Table 3 The test result of the steel

EXPERIMENT PROGRAM

Specimen

The main components of steel-concrete composite beams consist of a hot-rolled steel girder, concrete slab, perfobond shear connectors, and transverse reinforcements passing through the perfobond holes. The steel girder was hot-rolled steel of I-194×150×6×9. The perfobond shear connectors had a thickness of 8 mm, and a shape ℧ with an area of 4490 mm 2 . The perfobond connectors were welded continuously along the steel girder length. The hot-rolled steel used CT3, and the concrete slab had a thickness of 100 mm, as shown in Figure 1 . The number of perfobond shear connectors in beams was different to evaluate the effect of shear connection degree on the bending behavior of the steel-concrete composite beams. The number of perfobond shear connectors of beam 1, beam 2, and beam 3 is twenty, fourteen, and ten shear connectors, respectively. Among three steel-concrete composite beams, beam 1 and beam 3 have identical shear connector shapes and are different from the shear connector of beam 2. The capacity of each perfobond shear connector was P Rd = 141.42 kN, this value was observed by the push-out test of a small specimen. There were two reinforcements of 10 mm in diameter passing through the perfobond holes. The cross-section of steel-concrete composite beams is shown in Figure 2 . The parameters of steel-concrete composite beams are presented in Table 4 . Figure 3 illustrates the image of a steel-concrete composite beam before concreting.

Table 4 The parameters of composite beams

Figure 1 . Steel-concrete composite beams

Figure 2 . Cross section of steel-concrete composite beam

Figure 3 . Steel-concrete composite beam before concreting

Figure 4 . Model of test

Test setup

Four-point bending model was used to observe the bending behavior of the steel-concrete composite beams, as shown in Figure 4 . The load cell with a load level of 2000 kN was used for the bending test. The load was transferred through a steel beam. Linear Variable Displacement Transducers (LVDT) 1, 2, and 3 were used to measure vertical deflection along steel girder length, as shown in Figure 5 . LVDT 4, 5, 6, and 7 were used to measure the relative slip between the concrete slab and the steel girder. Strain gauges were used to measure the strain of the concrete slab and the steel girder during loading. Figure 6 illustrates the incremental loading process. The applied load was divided into three phrases:

Phase 1: Increasing load from 0 to 40% failure load (P max ), and then repeating 2 times.

Phase 2: Increasing load from 10% P max to 40% P max , and then repeat 25 times. This stage is to eliminate the adhesive force, friction, and residual strain of testing.

Phase 3: After ending phase 2, increase load from 10% P max to failure load, continue increasing load until the load remains 90% Pmax, and stop testing.

Figure 5 . LVDT1, 2, and 3 attached to measure the vertical deflection of the composite beam

Figure 6 . The incremental loading

TEST RESULTS, ANALYSIS, AND DISCUSS

The capacities and the vertical deflections of beams are presented in Table 5 .

Table 5 The bending test results

The load capacity

The load capacity

The load capacity

The vertical deflection

The vertical deflection

The vertical deflection

Conclusion

Experimental studies on three steel-concrete composite beams with different shear connection degrees and shapes, some suggestions are drawn out as follows:

No need to arrange over-shear connectors for steel-concrete composite beams with full shear connection degree. This does not enhance the load capacity and reduce the vertical deflection of the steel-concrete composite beams.

The values obtained from test results are rather identical to those of the predicted formula. The value of the experiment is reliable.

The shear connection degree affects the load capacity of the steel-concrete composite beam, conforming to the formula that determines the load capacity following the shear connection degree.

For the steel-concrete composite beam with a full shear connection degree, the shear connector shape almost does not affect the bending behavior of the steel-concrete composite beams.

Acknowledgment

We acknowledge Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT), VNU-HCM for supporting this study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors would like to declare that there is no conflict of interest in publishing the article.

Author contribution

Thai Hoa Dinh collected the data, Van Phuoc Nhan Le explained, gave ideas and content, and wrote the article.

References

  1. Veldanda MR, Hosain MU. Behaviour of Perfobond Rib Shear Connectors: Push-out Test. Can J Civ Eng. 1992;19:1-10. . ;:. Google Scholar
  2. Oguejiofor EC, Hosain MU. A Parametric Study of Perfobond Rib Shear Connectors. Can J Civ Eng. 1994;21:614-625. . ;:. Google Scholar
  3. Valente I, Cruz PJS. Experimental Analysis of Perfobond Shear Connection between Steel and Lightweight Concrete. J Constr Steel Res. 2004;60:465-479. . ;:. Google Scholar
  4. Cândido-Mar JPS, Costa-Neves LF, da S. Vellasco PCG. Experimental evaluation of the structural response of Perfobond shear connectors. Eng Struct. 2010;32:1976-1985. . ;:. Google Scholar
  5. Su Q, Yang G, Bradford MA. Bearing Capacity of Perfobond Rib Shear Connectors in Composite Girder Bridges. J Bridge Eng. 2016;21(4):06015009-1-7. . ;:. Google Scholar
  6. Zheng S, Zhao C, Liu Y. Analytical Model for Load–Slip Relationship of Perfobond Shear Connector Based on Push-Out Test. Materials. 2019;12:29. . ;:. Google Scholar
  7. Al-Shuwaili MA, Palmeri A, Lombardo M. Experimental Characterisation of Perfobond Shear Connectors through A New One-sided Push-out Test. Procedia Struct Integr. 2018;13:2024-2029. . ;:. Google Scholar
  8. Zheng S, Zhao C. Parametric Push-Out Analysis on Perfobond Rib with Headed Stud Mixed Shear Connector. Adv Civ Eng. 2019;2:1-16. . ;:. Google Scholar
  9. Yu Z, He S, Mosallam AS, Jiang S, Feng W. Experimental and Numerical Evaluation of Perfobond Rib Shear Connectors Embedded in Recycled Aggregate Concrete. Adv Civ Eng. 2020;Article ID 3157091, 16 pages. . ;:. Google Scholar
  10. Chromiak P, Studnicka J. Load Capacity of Perforated Shear Connector. Pollack Period. 2006;1(3):23-30. . ;:. Google Scholar
  11. Kang JY, Park JS, Jung WT, Keum MS. Evaluation of the Shear Strength of Perfobond Rib Connectors in Ultra High-Performance Concrete. Eng. 2014;6:989-999. . ;:. Google Scholar
  12. da S. Vellasco PCG, de Andrade SAL, Ferreira LTS, de Lima LRO. Semi-rigid composite frames with perfobond and T-rib connectors Part 1: Full-scale tests. J Constr Steel Res. 2007;63:263-279. . ;:. Google Scholar
  13. Vianna JC, Costa-Neves LF, da S. Vellasco PCG, de Andrade SAL. Structural Behaviour of T-Perfobond Shear Connectors in Composite Girders: An Experimental Approach. Eng Struct. 2008;30(9):2381-2391. . ;:. Google Scholar
  14. Vianna JC, Costa-Neves LF, da S. Vellasco PCG, de Andrade SAL. Experimental Assessment of Perfobond and T-Perfobond Shear Connectors’ Structural Response. J Constr Steel Res. 2009;65:408-421. . ;:. Google Scholar
  15. Vianna JC, de Andrade SAL, da S. Vellasco PCG, Costa-Neves LF. A Parametric Analysis of Composite Beams with T-Perfobond Shear Connectors. In: SDSS’Rio 2010 Stability and Ductility of Steel Structures. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; 2010. . ;:. Google Scholar
  16. Kim KS, Han O, Heo W, Kim SH. Behavior of Y-type perfobond rib shear connection under different cyclic loading conditions. Structures. 2020;26:562-571. . ;:. Google Scholar
  17. Oguejiofor EG, Hosain MU. Tests of full-size composite beams with perfobond rib connectors. Can J Civ Eng. 1995;22:80-92. . ;:. Google Scholar
  18. Fabbrocino G, Manfredi G, Cosenza E. Ductility of Composite Beams under Negative Bending: An Equivalence Index for Reinforcing Steel Classification. J Constr Steel Res. 2001;57:185-202. . ;:. Google Scholar
  19. Nie J, Fan J, Cai CS. Stiffness and Deflection of Steel–Concrete Composite Beams under Negative Bending. J Struct Eng ASCE. 2004;1842-1851. . ;:. Google Scholar
  20. Vasdravellis G, Uy B, Tan EL, Kirkland B. Behaviour and design of composite beams subjected to negative bending and compression. J Constr Steel Res. 2012;79:34-47. . ;:. Google Scholar
  21. Vietnam Standard TCVN 3118-1993: Heavyweight concrete - Method for determination of compressive strength. Hanoi, Vietnam; 1993. . ;:. Google Scholar
  22. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). Design of composite steel and concrete structures, part 1.1. General rules and rules for building, ENV-1993-1-1. Eurocode. Brussels, Belgium; 1994. . ;:. Google Scholar


Author's Affiliation
Article Details

Issue: Vol 7 No 3 (2024)
Page No.: 2393-2401
Published: Dec 31, 2024
Section: Research article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32508/stdjet.v7i3.1348

 Copyright Info

Creative Commons License

Copyright: The Authors. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

 How to Cite
Le, P. N., & Dinh, T. (2024). Evaluating the effect of shear connection degree and shear connector shape on the bending behavior of steel-concrete composite beam. VNUHCM Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(3), 2393-2401. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32508/stdjet.v7i3.1348

 Cited by



Article level Metrics by Paperbuzz/Impactstory
Article level Metrics by Altmetrics

 Article Statistics
HTML = 3 times
PDF   = 6 times
XML   = 0 times
Total   = 6 times